Victory for 54 Numsa members as Labour Court rules in favour of dismissed Goodyear workers

Numsa has welcomed the decision by the Labour Court which has set aside the dismissal of 54 Goodyear employees and Numsa members

Numsa has welcomed the decision by the Labour Court which has set aside the dismissal of 54 Goodyear employees and Numsa members

Published Nov 14, 2024

Share

The National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa (Numsa) has hailed a critical victory for justice and workers' rights, following a Labour Court ruling that prevented Goodyear from dismissing 54 employees who had been fighting their case for over 13 years.

The ruling underscores the ongoing struggle for fair treatment and adherence to proper labour practices within South Africa's industrial sectors.

Phakamile Hlubi-Majola, a spokesperson for Numsa, revealed that the saga began on May 31, 2021 when these workers were dismissed following their refusal to comply with a controversial directive to work staggered breaks. This management decision was met with discontent, as workers felt that their rights and welfare were being compromised to ensure uninterrupted production.

“These workers who are NUMSA members have been fighting for justice since their unfair dismissal," Hlubi-Majola stated.

“Management overreacted when employees rejected the instruction. Their refusal stemmed from genuine concerns about working conditions, leading to a dismissal that was not warranted.”

The unfair dismissal case made its way through arbitration at the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA), with the initial outcome in June 2022 highlighting the flawed nature of the dismissals.

Although the CCMA concluded that the workers had displayed insubordinate behaviour, it ruled that their conduct did not warrant such severe consequences as dismissal. The ruling mandated their reinstatement.

Numsa's spokesperson elaborated that during the arbitration, it became evident that procedures surrounding the issuance of final written warnings against the employees were fundamentally unfair. Despite explicitly requesting union representation during the process, workers were denied this crucial support, undermining the validity of the warnings issued against them.

Hlubi-Majola added, “The commissioner acknowledged that the warnings were part of Goodyear’s strategy to ultimately dismiss workers. The issuance was not only hasty but also a calculated move to facilitate mass dismissals, disrupting what should constitute a fair dismissal process.”

While the CCMA ruling initially favoured the workers, Goodyear attempted to overturn this decision, taking the matter to the Labour Court. However, Numsa’s determination shone through as they once again secured a favourable outcome for their members, with the Labour Court upholding the workers' right to be reinstated.

“As a caring union, Numsa remains resolute in protecting the rights of our members. The Labour Court’s dismissal of Goodyear's application is a significant win for workers' rights,” Hlubi-Majola stated. “We have also been informed that Goodyear plans to appeal this decision. Should this occur, we stand ready to defend our members once more.”